Narcotics / Drugs / Controlled Substances
Drug offenses run the gamut from simple possession of marijuana (Health and
Safety Code section 11357(b)), methamphetamine (Health and Safety Code section
11377), and cocaine (Health and Safety Code section 11350) in state court to
possession for sale, sale, manufacturing and distribution of controlled
substances in state or federal court. (Health and Safety Code sections 11350,
11351, 11352, 11351.5, 11358, 11359, 11364, 11377, 11378; 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 844,
953) California law advocates treatment rather than punishment for nonviolent
drug offenders who are charged with offenses of simple possession or under the
influence.
For most people charged with their first drug offense
involving simple possession of a controlled substance, California law provides
for deferred entry of judgment, formerly known as drug diversion. (Penal Code
section 1000) Under this program, the person pleads guilty and is directed to
participate in an out-patient drug program. If the person completes the program
and does not pick up a new case for 18 months to three years, there is no
conviction, the guilty pleas is set aside and the arrest is deemed never to have
occurred. (Penal Code section 1000.4)
Even those individuals prosecuted
for drug offenses who have prior drug convictions or significant criminal
records may be eligible for drug treatment instead of incarceration. In November
2000, California voters passed Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime
Prevention Act, which requires courts place many defendants in non-residential
treatment programs and prohibits imposing jail sentences under many
circumstances. (Penal Code section 1210) Proposition 36 also helps keep out of
jail those people who relapse while participating in court-ordered treatment.
In 1996, California voters approved Proposition 215, the Compassionate
Use Act of 1996, which allows Californians to possess, use, and cultivate
marijuana for medicinal purposes. (Health and Safety Code section 11362.5) In
2003, California enacted the Medical Marijuana Program Act, which, among other
things, granted limited immunity to individuals who cultivate marijuana as part
of a collective or cooperative organization. (Health and Safety Code section
11362.775) These laws represent a significant change in the legal landscape, and
afford medical marijuana patients protections that did not previously exist.
At Nolan, Armstrong & Barton, we are knowledgeable about drug laws, medical
marijuana, and all the available treatment options. When appropriate, we also
encourage our clients to pursue psychological counseling or participate in drug
and alcohol treatment programs. In cases involving sales or manufacturing of
drugs, where treatment options are not generally available, we draw on our
extensive legal experience to present the best defense. We pursue claims that
detentions, arrests, searches or wiretaps were unlawful.
We are not
afraid to aggressively defend drug charges at trial. Attorneys at Nolan,
Armstrong & Barton have successfully defeated charges of drug possession, drug
sale, possession for sale, manufacturing and conspiracy at jury trial. The
attorneys have also assisted medical marijuana users and caregivers in defending
their cases based on the Compassionate Use Act.
